Sarmadi

Amir S. v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20253:25-cv-02483California864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AMIR S., Case No.: 25-cv-2483-DEB Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SCREENING ORDER

SECURITY,

15 Defendant.

[DKT. NO. 2] 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Amir S.’s Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP Application”). Dkt. No. 2. I. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION All parties instituting any civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Courts may waive prepayment of fees if the plaintiff submits an affidavit, including a statement of all his assets, showing he is unable to pay the filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The affidavit must “state the facts as to [the] affiant’s poverty with some particularity, definiteness and certainty.” Escobedo v. 27 1 In the interest of privacy,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.