Fong

Peter Fong, et al. v. U.S. Bancorp, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20252:22-cv-01291California1,513 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER FONG, et al., Case No. 2:22-cv-01291-DC-CSK Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

v. TO COMPEL U.S. BANCORP, et al., (ECF No. 80) Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Peter Fong and Sut Fong’s motion to compel discovery responses.1 (ECF No. 80). A hearing was held via Zoom on December 16, 2025. Attorney Jason Toji Calabro appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Attorneys Karin Bohmholdt and Sam Payne appeared on behalf of Defendants U.S. Bancorp and U.S. Bank National Association. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Plaintiffs’ motion to compel. I. LEGAL STANDARDS “Parties may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party's claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case[.]” Fed. R. Civ.

This matter proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.