Armenta-Rosales

JORGE ARTURO ARMENTA-ROSALES; CUBERTO CHAVEZ ABARCA; ORLANDO SEGURA ERAZO; MARIO IGNACIO MONTES ROCHA; MARCOS ANTONIO PINEDA; RODOLFO VILLANUEAVA-CONTRERAS v.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20253:25-cv-03505California404 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 25cv3505 DMS BLM

JORGE ARTURO ARMENTA-

ROSALES; CUBERTO CHAVEZ

ORDER GRANTING PETITIONERS’

ABARCA; ORLANDO SEGURA

EX PARTE MOTION FOR

ERAZO; MARIO IGNACIO MONTES

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

ROCHA; MARCOS ANTONIO

ORDER

PINEDA; RODOLFO VILLANUEAVA-

CONTRERAS,

16 Petitioners, v. 18 KRISTI NOEM, Secretary, U.S. 19 Department of Homeland Security; et al. 20 Respondents. 21 This case comes before the Court on Petitioners’ ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). Respondents filed an opposition to the motion, Petitioners filed a reply and a Notice of New Authority, and Respondents filed a Supplemental Brief. The New Authority is an order issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Maldonado Bautista v. Santacruz, Case No. 5:25-cv- 01873-SSS-BFM, granting in part and denying in part the petitioners’ ex parte application for reconsideration…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.