Fackrell

Jonathan M. Raridon v. Fackrell, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20252:24-cv-02920California1,144 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN M. RARIDON, Case No. 2:24-cv-2920-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER FACKRELL, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, alleges that defendant Fackrell violated his due process rights by making biased and racist remarks during a disciplinary hearing. Pending is defendant’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 25. I will dismiss this case without leave to amend. Allegations On April 10, 2024, Fackrell presided over a disciplinary hearing in which plaintiff was charged with battering and seriously injuring another inmate. ECF No. 1 at 8, 10. Fackrell found by a preponderance of the evidence that the allegations were true and assessed plaintiff a loss of 200 days of credit. Id. at 27-28. Fackrell based his findings on video footage that showed plaintiff attacking the other inmate. Id. Following the hearing, plaintiff filed a grievance complaining that Fackrell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.