CIXTO CRUZ MURILLO v. MULE CREEK STATE PRISON

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20252:24-cv-03458California287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CIXTO CRUZ MURILLO, No. 2:24-CV-3458-DC-DMC-P Petitioner,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Pending before the Court is Petitioner’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 19, which this Court construes as a notice of voluntary dismissal. Petitioner asserts that he seeks dismissal because he has pending parole hearings and therefore, does not seek habeas relief at this time. See ECF No. 19. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] Good cause appearing therefor, the undersigned recommends this action be 2 || dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 4 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within 14 days 5 || after being served with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.