CDCR

Sean Vasquez v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 17, 20252:25-cv-02432California4,818 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN VASQUEZ, No. 2:25-cv-02432 SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12131 et seq. (“Title II” or “ADA”). Plaintiff’s complaint is before the undersigned for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. ECF No. 1. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned finds that plaintiff’s complaint states a cognizable Title II claim against defendant California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) but no other cognizable claims. Plaintiff will be given the option of proceeding on the complaint as screened or filing an amended complaint. In addition, plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 2) is denied without prejudice. IN FORMA…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.