Greenspan

Aaron Jacob Greenspan v. Elon Musk, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20253:24-cv-04647California1,516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 AARON JACOB GREENSPAN, Case No. 24-cv-04647-MMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR REVIEW AND

REVERSAL OF CLERK’S COSTS

ELON MUSK, et al., AWARD Defendants.

Before the Court is plaintiff Aaron Jacob Greenspan’s (“Greenspan”) Motion, filed November 8, 2025, “for Court Review and Reversal of Clerk’s Costs Award.” Defendants Elon Musk, Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”), the Elon Musk Revocable Trust dated July 22, 2003, Excession, LLC, Jared Birchall, Singer Cashman, LLP, Allison Huebert, Adam S. Cashman, Adam G. Mehes, and Alex Spiro have filed opposition, to which Greenspan has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 By the Court’s prior order, filed July 17, 2025, Greenspan’s federal claims were dismissed with prejudice and his state law claims were remanded to state court (see Order Re Motions to Dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.