Willis

Willis v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202524-2548California442 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENTRELL WILLIS, No. 24-2548 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 1:19-cv-00761-BAM v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Barbara McAuliffe, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted December 17, 2025***

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Kentrell Willis appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment in Willis’s action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”)

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). alleging sexual assault and negligence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.