Pollard

Williams v. Pollard

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202524-3582California467 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, No. 24-3582 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:21-cv-00055-RSH-DTF v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARCUS POLLARD, Warden; R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden; O.

NAVARRO; KATHLEEN ALLISON,

Secretary, CDCR; CONNIE GIPSON, Deputy Director, CDCR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Robert Steven Huie, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner John Wesley Williams appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). defendants failed to protect him from COVID-19. We have jurisdiction under

28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.