Fang

United States v. Fang

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202525-3115California319 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 25-3115 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:24-cr-00001-RVM-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

YE FANG, AKA BATU,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the District of Northern Mariana Islands Ramona V. Manglona, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Ye Fang appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his

guilty-plea conviction and 300-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with

intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1),

(b)(1)(A)(viii), and 846.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Fang’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.