Bondi

Orrego Prieto v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202525-2796California413 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATALY ORREGO PRIETO; et al., No. 25-2796 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A246-293-847

A246-293-848

v.

A246-293-849

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Nataly Orrego Prieto and her children, natives and citizens of Colombia,

petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their

application for asylum and Orrego Prieto’s applications for withholding of removal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.