Huffman

Huffman v. Sniff

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202524-4268California426 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE DAVID HUFFMAN, No. 24-4268 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:17-cv-01197-JLS-MRW v.

MEMORANDUM*

STANLEY L. SNIFF, Riverside County Sheriff, in individual capacity and official capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Josephine L. Staton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner George David Huffman appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in Huffman’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging

deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs while he was a pretrial

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). detainee. “We have an independent obligation to inquire into…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.