Forsman

Forsman v. Port of Seattle

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202524-5643California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND A. FORSMAN, No. 24-5643 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:24-cv-01101-RSL v.

MEMORANDUM*

PORT OF SEATTLE; K.

LYLES; STEPHANIE JONES

STEBBINS; DELINAS WHITTAKER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Robert S. Lasnik, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Raymond A. Forsman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging federal claims related to disputed fees and the

possession and registration of a fishing vessel. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. W. Radio Servs. Co. v. Glickman, 123…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.