Biesemeyer

Biesemeyer v. Municipality of Anchorage

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 22, 202524-5670California400 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 22 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID PAUL BIESEMEYER, No. 24-5670 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 3:23-cv-00185-SLG-KFR v.

MEMORANDUM*

MUNICIPALITY OF ANCHORAGE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Sharon L. Gleason, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

David Paul Biesemeyer appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations stemming

from a foreclosure sale. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Cervantes v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.