Perez

Perez v. Aranda CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2025B342303California861 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cody, J.

DISCUSSION

Section 473 subdivision (b) has two provisions. One is discretionary, the other mandatory. The discretionary provision authorizes relief from judgment, dismissal, order, or other

2 proceeding.2 The mandatory provision authorizes relief only from a clerk’s entry of default, default judgment, or dismissal.3 “A motion to vacate under section 473(b) ‘“‘is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and in the absence of a clear showing of abuse . . . the exercise of that discretion will not be disturbed on appeal.’” [Citation.] The appropriate test for abuse of discretion is whether the trial court exceeded the bounds of reason.’ [Citations.] However, ‘[b]ecause the law favors disposing of cases on their merits, “any doubts in applying section 473 must be resolved in favor of the party seeking relief from default [citations]. Therefore, a trial court order denying relief is scrutinized more carefully than an order permitting trial on the merits.”’ [Citation.] Moreover, ‘failure to exercise discretion is

2 Section 473, subdivision (b)’s discretionary provision

provides: “[t]he court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.