Ragland

Ragland v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 22, 2025G063682MCalifornia5,004 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/22/25 Ragland v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

PAM RAGLAND,

Plaintiff and Appellant, G063682

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2020- 01137118) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as Trustee, etc., et al., ORDER GRANTING MOTION

TO FILE AMENDED

Defendants and Respondents. PETITION FOR REHEARING,

MODIFYING OPINION, AND

DENYING REHEARING; NO

CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

Appellant’s “Motion for Leave to File Amended and Corrected Petition for Rehearing” is GRANTED pursuant to rule 8.268(b)(4) of the California Rules of Court, notwithstanding that the proposed amended petition violates rule 8.204(c)(5) by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.