Sanas.AI Inc. v. Krisp Technologies, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANAS.AI INC.,

Case No. 25-cv-05666-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

KRISP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

13 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Krisp Technologies (“Krisp”) has filed a second Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss claims asserted in Plaintiff Sanas AI’s first amended complaint. This successive motion is improper under Rule 12 as set forth below and therefore denied. II. BACKGROUND Sanas AI (“Sanas”) and Krisp are competitors in the market for real-time accent conversion and background noise reduction technology. The companies explored a possible business collaboration throughout 2021 and 2022, but the conversations stopped abruptly in Fall 2022. Then, on July 7, 2025, Sanas filed a complaint against Krisp, alleging patent infringement among other non-patent claims. Two months later, on September 8, 2025, Krisp filed an answer…