Mel Bruschi v. Wilmington Community Clinic

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20252:25-cv-11923California1,013 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 25-11923 PA (RAOx) Date December 19, 2025 Title Mel Bruschi v. Wilmington Community Clinic

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Kamilla Sali-Suleyman None N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: None Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—COURT ORDER

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress. See, e.g., Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S. Ct. 1673, 1675, 128 L. Ed. 2d 391 (1994). This Court has a continuing obligation to assess its subject matter jurisdiction, and may consider the issue sua sponte at any stage of the proceedings. See, e.g., Allstate Ins. Co. v. Hughes, 358 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir. 2004). Here, plaintiff Mel Bruschi (“Plaintiff”) alleges jurisdiction exists based on diversity of citizenship pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.