Marlon Jermaine Johnson v. E. Ricolcol, Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 16, 20255:24-cv-01711California712 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O 2

4

6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 MARLON JERMAINE JOHNSON, NO. EDCV 24-1711 CAS (AGR) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION OF

v.

MAGISTRATE JUDGE

E. RICOLCOL, Warden,

15 Respondent.

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), the Objections and the Response. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Report. 24 In the Objections, Petitioner discloses for the first time that he submitted a 25 BP-11 form at the final level on June 5, 2025, after Respondent filed the motion to 26 dismiss the Petition for failure to exhaust administrative remedies on April 21, 27 28 2025. (Obj., Dkt. No. 13 at 3.) On June…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.