Harris

Paul Harris v. Daniel P. Driscoll

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20254:25-cv-03901California2,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAUL HARRIS, Case No. 25-cv-03901-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

DANIEL P. DRISCOLL, Re: ECF No. 12 Defendant.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Daniel P. Driscoll’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 12. The Court will grant the motion. I. BACKGROUND On May 5, 2025, Plaintiff Paul Harris filed this action, accusing Defendant of “violat[ing] Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act” and wrongful termination. ECF No. 1 (“Comp.”) ¶ 21, 23, 25. Harris alleges Defendant violated the Rehabilitation Act “by discriminating against [Harris] on the basis of his disabilities” (id. ¶ 21) and “fail[ing] to provide reasonable accommodations for [Harris’s] known disabilities” (id. ¶ 23). As alleged in the complaint, Harris was employed by the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“USACE”) as an Engineer Technician “from April 2011 until his separation on February 1, 2020.” Id. ¶ 6. Harris…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.