Bonilla

Mario Bonilla v. American General Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20254:25-cv-05203California2,516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

19 A. Factual Background 20 The following allegations in the complaint are taken as true for the purposes of the 21 motion. Plaintiff is a lawful permanent resident of the United States who was born in Colombia. 22 Compl. ¶¶ 1, 8. On July 22, 2020, Plaintiff applied for a life insurance policy with American 23 General in the amount of $100,000. Id. ¶ 7. During the initial telephone interview with American 24 25 1 “Analysis under Rule 12(c) is ‘substantially identical’ to analysis under Rule 12(b)(6) because, 26 under both rules, ‘a court must determine whether the facts alleged in the complaint, taken as true, entitle the plaintiff to a legal remedy.’” Chavez v. United States, 683 F.3d 1102, 1108 (9th Cir. 27 2012) (quoting Brooks v. Dunlop Mfg. Inc., No. C 10–04341 CRB, 2011 WL 6140912, at *3 (N.D. General Agent Brenda Pelayo, Plaintiff disclosed that he was born in Colombia and had misplaced his permanent resident card (green card), but was in the process of obtaining a replacement. Id. ¶ 8. Plaintiff asked if alternative documentation would be acceptable to prove his lawful permanent resident status if his replacement green card did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.