Langham

Langham v. Noyd

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202524-7292California1,716 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MALIK LANGHAM, No. 24-7292 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:22-cv-06284-YGR v.

MEMORANDUM*

JUSTIN NOYD, Patrol Officer,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

CITY OF UNION CITY, ELMORE

SPENCER, Patrol Officer,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 10, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: BUMATAY, JOHNSTONE, and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge BUMATAY.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Officer Justin Noyd appeals from the district court’s denial of summary

judgment on his qualified immunity claim and grant of summary judgment1 for

Malik Langham, proceeding pro se. Langham sued Officer Noyd under 42…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.