Enyart

Enyart v. County of San Bernardino

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202524-6083California756 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCES ENYART, individually, and as No. 24-6083 Successor in Interest to William Enyart; D.C. No. GREGORY ENYART, as an individual; A. 5:23-cv-00540-RGK-SHK E., a minor by and through her guardian ad litem, Amanda Kelley,

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

AARON CONLEY, Deputy C. UMPHLETT, ROD SKAGGS, Deputy SNOW, DOES 1-10, inclusive,

Defendants.

FRANCES ENYART; GREGORY No. 25-289

ENYART; A. E.,

D.C. No. Plaintiffs - Appellees, 5:23-cv-00540-RGK-SHK

v.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

AARON CONLEY, C. UMPHLETT, ROD

SKAGGS, SNOW, DOES 1-10,

Defendants,

and

COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted December 4, 2025…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.