Larson

Larson v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 23, 2025C100033California4,106 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 12/23/25 Larson v. The Regents of the U. of Cal. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

JEANIE LARSON, C100033

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2020- 00278764-CU-WT-GDS) v.

THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA,

Defendant and Respondent.

After the Regents of the University of California (the university) terminated Jeanie Larson’s employment, Larson sued for retaliation and discrimination. The trial court granted the university’s motion for summary judgment, and Larson appeals. Because Larson fails to meet her burden to show error, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The university hired Larson as the chief information security officer of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.