Parker

United States v. Parker

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202524-7625California390 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-7625 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-NJK-11 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ERIC JAMES PARKER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Eric James Parker appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. Reviewing de novo, see United States v. Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The request for oral argument is therefore denied. Cir. 2007), we affirm.

Parker contends he is entitled to coram nobis relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.