Hedges

Hedges v. USA

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202525-3152California231 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRAIG JOSEPH HEDGES, No. 25-3152 D.C. No. 3:24-cv-08354-TLT Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA;

CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX

BOARD; DAVID A. HUBBERT, Deputy Assistant Attorney General,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Trina L. Thompson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Craig Joseph Hedges appeals pro se from the district court’s order

dismissing for failure to prosecute his action challenging the federal government’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). authority to tax Hedges. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.