Shalaby

Shalaby v. Newell Brands Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202524-679California458 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREW W. SHALABY; SONIA DUNN- No. 24-679 RUIZ, D.C. No. 3:11-cv-00068-AJB-DHB Plaintiffs - Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

NEWELL BRANDS INC., on behalf of the defendant formerly known as Bernzomatic, an unincorporated division of Irwin Industrial Tool Company, and Newell Operating Company,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

BERNZOMATIC, an unincorporated division of Irwin Industrial Tool Company; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Anthony J. Battaglia, District Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Andrew W. Shalaby, a pro se attorney, and Sonia Dunn-Ruiz, represented by

Shalaby, appeal from the district court’s orders denying post-judgment relief and

imposing sanctions in Shalaby’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.