Palaniappan
Palaniappan v. United States
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NATARAJAN PALANIAPPAN; SATYA No. 24-2502 SREE DANDAMUDI, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01685-DLR Plaintiffs - Appellants,
MEMORANDUM*
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted December 17, 2025**
Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.
Natarajan Palaniappan and Satya Sree Dandamudi appeal pro se from the
district court’s judgment on the pleadings in their action seeking a tax refund from
the IRS for tax year 2016. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo. Fleming v. Pickard, 581 F.3d 922, 925 (9th Cir. 2009). We
affirm.