Palaniappan

Palaniappan v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202524-2502California280 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATARAJAN PALANIAPPAN; SATYA No. 24-2502 SREE DANDAMUDI, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01685-DLR Plaintiffs - Appellants,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Natarajan Palaniappan and Satya Sree Dandamudi appeal pro se from the

district court’s judgment on the pleadings in their action seeking a tax refund from

the IRS for tax year 2016. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo. Fleming v. Pickard, 581 F.3d 922, 925 (9th Cir. 2009). We

affirm.

The district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.