Miao

Miao v. Lacampagne

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 23, 202525-5589California373 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 23 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ZHUO QUAN MIAO, No. 25-5589 D.C. No. 3:25-cv-06784-CRB Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEMORANDUM*

DANIELLE LACAMPAGNE; AMY

MIAO; SAN MATEO COUNTY OFFICE

OF THE PUBLIC GUARDIAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Charles R. Breyer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 17, 2025**

Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

Zhuo Quan Miao appeals pro se from the district court’s order abstaining

from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under Colorado River Water Conservation

District v. United States, 424 U.S. 800 (1976). We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether the facts of a case meet the

requirements for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.