Junior Rodriguez Gonzales v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20255:25-cv-10838California270 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUNIOR RODRIGUEZ GONZALES, Case No. 25-cv-10838-EKL Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT

Vv. PREJUDICE U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS Re: Dkt. No. 1 ENFORCEMENT, et al., Defendants.

Jurisdiction over habeas petitions like the one in this case “lies in only one district: the district of confinement.” Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 443 (2004); see also Doe v. Garland, 109 F.4th 1188, 1197-99 (9th Cir. 2024) (applying this principle to a habeas petition challenging a |] immigration detention). According to the Court’s electronic case filing system, Petitioner filed his habeas petition on December 19, 2025, at 11:15 a.m. At that time, Petitioner was detained — and || continues to be detained — at the California City Detention Facility. Petition Jf 1, 5-6, 11, ECF || No. 1; see also ECF No. 3-2 at 3. That facility is located in the Eastern District of California. The Court therefore…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.