Ghosal

Ghosal v. Ajou CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 2025D084846California2,159 words

Opinion

Opinion

Castillo, J.

Filed 12/24/25 Ghosal v. Ajou CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SAMIRA GHOSAL et al., D084846

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2022- 00052537-CU-OR-CTL) RAAD AJOU et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, James A. Mangione, Judge. Affirmed. Samira Ghosal and Francis Ghosal, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs and Appellants. First American Law Group, Patrick Reider and Nicole S. Dunn for Defendants and Respondents. In February 2014, Samira and Francis Ghosal lost a parcel of real property to foreclosure. Around March 2016, the property was sold to Raad and Thana Ajou. In December 2022, the Ghosals filed a complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.