Kruschen

Kruschen v. Annandale Townhouse Assn. CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 24, 2025B337889California3,930 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 12/24/25 Kruschen v. Annandale Townhouse Assn. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

DOUGLAS KRUSCHEN, B337889

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. v. 23VECV05191)

ANNANDALE TOWNHOUSE

ASSOCIATION, INC, et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Eric P. Harmon, Judge. Affirmed. Kulik Gottesman Siegel & Ware, Leonard Siegel, Thomas M. Ware II, Mitchell S. Brachman and Elmira Tofanyan for Defendants and Appellants. Myers Widders, Gibson, Jones & Feingold and James E. Perero for Plaintiff and Respondent. ________________________ Defendant and appellant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.