Ammari

DISCUSSION

I. Sami Timely Appealed from the Postjudgment Order

Denying His Motion to Set Aside the Default Judgment Razan contends Sami did not timely appeal from the default judgment. We need not address this issue because Sami timely appealed from the postjudgment order denying his motion to set aside the judgment under section 473, subdivision (d). Generally, a notice of appeal must be filed on or before the earliest of 60 days after the superior court clerk or a party serves a document entitled “Notice of Entry” of judgment, or 180 days

All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.

3 after entry of judgment. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.104(a)(1).) For purposes of this rule, “ ‘judgment’ includes an appealable order . . . .” (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.104(e).) Orders denying statutory motions to set aside a judgment are appealable. (Shapiro v. Clark (2008) 164 Cal.App.4th 1128, 1137; Peltier v. McCloud River R.R. Co. (1995) 34 Cal.App.4th 1809, 1815.) The trial court denied Sami’s postjudgment motion for relief from default under section 473, subdivision (d) on October 10, 2023. The record does not reflect that the clerk or any party served…