Macomber

Emerson Robert Gaitan v. Macomber et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20251:25-cv-00915California1,918 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMERSON ROBERT GAITAN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00915-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION1

v.

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

MACOMBER et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Emerson Gaitan is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 25, 2025. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the district court dismiss this action for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order and prosecute this action. BACKGROUND On September 19, 2025, this Court issued Findings and Recommendation (F&R) to the district judge to deny Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis because Plaintiff’s income level exceeded the federal poverty threshold under § 1915(a)(1) and Plaintiff’s application reflected that he had adequate funds remaining each month after he paid all monthly expenses. (Doc. No. 6). On October 2, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.