Duran-Rodriguez

Yalfrison Enrique Duran-Rodriguez v. Kristi Noem, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20253:25-cv-03096California325 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YALFRISON ENRIQUE DURAN- Case No.: 25-cv-03096-CAB-DEB

RODRIGUEZ,

ORDER REQUIRING A BOND

Petitioner, HEARING v. 14 [Doc. No. 1] KRISTI NOEM, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Pending before the Court is a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 18 U.S.C. § 2241 filed by Yalfrison Enrique Duran-Rodriguez (“Petitioner”). [Doc. No. 1 19 (“Petition”).] Petitioner asserts he is being detained by Immigration and Customs 20 Enforcement (“ICE”) without a bond hearing in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and the 21 Fifth Amendment. [Id. at 7–10.] 22 On December 19, 2025, Respondents filed a Supplemental Brief stating that: 23 Petitioner appears to be a member of the Bond Eligible Class certified in 24 Maldonado Bautista v. Santacruz, No. 5:25-CV-01873-SSS-BFM, --- F. Supp. 3d ---, 2025 WL 3288403 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2025). The Bautista court has entered final judgement as to the Bond Eligible Class. Bautista, 26 [Doc. No.] 94. Accordingly, Respondents acknowledge that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.