Frank Bell v. Hawx Services, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20252:24-cv-00825California1,947 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRANK BELL, No. 2:24-CV-0825-DC-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER HAWX SERVICES, LLC., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this civil action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. (TCPA). Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for early discovery. See ECF No. 31. Defendant has filed an opposition. See ECF No. 34. Plaintiff has filed a reply. See ECF No. 37. The Court determines that Plaintiff’s motion, which is fully briefed, is suitable for decision without oral argument. See E. Dist. Cal. Local Rule 230(g). Accordingly, the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion set before the undersigned in Redding, California, on January 7, 2026, will be vacated. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiff’s motion for early discovery will be denied. / / / / / / / / / / / / I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.