Matthew R. Walsh v. Rokoko Electronics et al.

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 MATTHEW R. WALSH, Case № 2:25-cv-05340-ODW (RAOx)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING

v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS [42]; AND DENYING

14 ROKOKO ELECTRONICS et al., PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE

Defendants. [49]

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Matthew R. Walsh initiated this action in state court against Defendant 19 Rokoko Electronics, asserting various claims arising from Walsh’s purchase of several 20 Rokoko motion capture products. (Notice Removal (“NOR”) Ex. 1 (“Compl.”), Dkt. 21 No. 1-1.) On June 12, 2025, Rokoko removed the case to this Court. (NOR, Dkt. 22 No. 1.) Rokoko now moves to dismiss all fourteen of Walsh’s claims. (Mot. Dismiss 23 (“MTD”), Dkt. No. 42.) Walsh, in turn, moves to strike Rokoko’s Notice of Removal 24 for procedural defects and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Mot. Strike (“MTS”), 25 Dkt. No. 49.) For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Rokoko’s Motion 26 to Dismiss…