Anderson

Parker Anderson, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Brooklinen, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaDecember 24, 20253:25-cv-02446California2,704 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PARKER ANDERSON, individually and on Case No.: 25-cv-2446-RSH-KSC behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, REMAND v. 14 [ECF No. 5] BROOKLINEN, INC., et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is a motion to remand filed by plaintiff Parker Anderson. ECF No. 5. As set forth below, the motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND On November 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed this putative class action against defendant Brooklinen, Inc., in the California Superior Court for the County of San Diego. ECF No. 1-2 (“Compl.”). The Complaint alleges as follows. Defendant markets and sells bed sheets, linens, and other bedding products online through its website. Id. ¶ 2. At issue in this case are products that Defendant’s website lists for sale at a price that is purportedly discounted from a higher reference price—for example, a comforter listed for sale at “$199 $159.20,” accompanied with the words “20% off everything”—where Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.