Priestley Faucett v. Move, Inc. d/b/a Realtor.com

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20252:22-cv-04948California6,014 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 PRIESTLEY FAUCETT, Case № 2:22-cv-04948-ODW (ASx)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v.

RENEWED MOTION FOR CLASS

14 MOVE, INC. d/b/a REALTOR.COM, CERTIFICATION [114]

15 Defendant.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Priestley Faucett brings this putative class action against Defendant 19 Move, Inc. d/b/a Realtor.com (“Move”), asserting claims under the Telephone 20 Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) ¶ 2, Dkt. No. 18.) 21 Faucett now moves for class certification pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 22 (“Rule” or “Rules”) 23(b)(2), and 23(b)(3). (Renewed Mot. Class Certification 23 (“Mot.” or “Motion”), Dkt. Nos. 114 (unsealed), 115 (sealed).) For the reasons 24 discussed below, the Court DENIES Faucett’s Motion.1 25 26

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; C.D. Cal. L.R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.