Santoro

Melvin R. Arrant v. Kelly Santoro, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20251:20-cv-01253California966 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN R. ARRANT, No. 1:20-cv-01253-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION v. Doc. 101 KELLY SANTORO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following the final ruling on defendants’ motion for summary judgment, this case is ready to proceed with two separate jury trials on plaintiff’s excessive force claim against defendant Florez and plaintiff’s excessive force and retaliation claims against defendant Tapia. Doc. 96. On October 16, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge ordered the parties to advise the Court whether they believed a settlement conference would be productive. Doc. No. 97. The October 14, 2025, order adopting findings and recommendations and the October 16, 2025 order were served at plaintiff’s address of record but were returned by the United States Postal Service as undeliverable on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.