Yesica Castro et al v. General Motors, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20252:25-cv-08792California2,895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

On January 23, 2023, Plaintiffs purchased a 2022 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 (the “Vehicle”) manufactured by Defendant. (Complaint (Docket No. 1-1) ¶¶ 6, 9). In connection with the purchase, Plaintiffs received various warranties. (Id. ¶ 11). Following the purchase, Plaintiffs allege that defects manifested in the Vehicle, including “engine defects.” (Id. ¶ 12). Plaintiffs presented the Vehicle to Defendant and/or its authorized service and repair facilities for diagnosis and repair of the defects, ______________________________________________________________________________

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 25-8792-MWF (SSCx) Date: December 22, 2025 Title: Yesica Castro et al v. General Motors, LLC but Plaintiffs allege that Defendant failed to service or repair the Vehicle in conformance with the express warranties provided to Plaintiffs. (Id. ¶¶ 13–14). Based on the above allegations, Plaintiffs allege violations of the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act (“SBA”), Cal. Civ. Code Sections 1793.2, 1791.1, and violations of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (“MMWA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2301– 2312. (Id. ¶¶ 8–44).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.