Gray

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RICHARD BERNARD GRAY, Case No. 1:25-cv-00594-SAB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT OF THIS MATTER TO A DISTRICT JUDGE v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOHNATHAN MARTIN, et al., RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION Defendants. 16 On May 20, 2025, Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, commenced this action. (ECF No. 1.) On June 6, 2025, the Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to state a claim. (ECF No. 4.) The Court gave Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint in order to address the pleading deficiencies. (Id.) On June 16, 2025, Plaintiff timely filed a first amended complaint (ECF No. 5), and on July 17, 2025, the Court undertook the screening of that complaint. (ECF No. 6.) Again, the Court found that Plaintiff had failed to state a claim, but given the allegations raised, the Court determined to give Plaintiff leave to amend. (Id.) On August 15,…