Apexxus LLC v. OptumRx, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 22, 20254:25-cv-00049California18,308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 APEXXUS LLC, Case No. 25-cv-00049-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION

OPTUMRX, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 12, 19 Defendant.

Plaintiff Apexxus LLC (“Apexxus”) filed this lawsuit against Defendant OptumRx, Inc. (“Optum”) alleging breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, quantum meruit, and other related state law claims. [Docket No. 1-2 (First Amended Complaint, “FAC”).] Optum now moves to compel arbitration. [Docket Nos. 11 (Mot.); 32 (Reply).] Apexxus opposes. [Docket No. 26 (Opp’n).] At the court’s instruction, the parties provided supplemental briefing. [Docket Nos. 38 (Plf. Supp. Brief); 39 (Def. Supp. Brief); 40 (Plf. Supp. Reply).] This matter is suitable for determination without oral argument. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the motion to compel arbitration is granted in part and denied in part. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.