Tabora
Karen M. Tabora v. Daniel Boyd, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KAREN M. TABORA, Case No. 4:25-cv-00250-KAW
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS WITHOUT LEAVE TO
v. AMEND
DANIEL BOYD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendants.
12 On July 29, 2025, Defendants Daniel Boyd, Rony Flores, Prince Nagi, and Uriel Vazquez filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. (Defs.’ Mot., Dkt. No. 22.) Upon review of the moving papers, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), and, for the reasons set forth below, GRANTS the motion to dismiss without leave to amend because any amendment would be futile. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background This case is related to the earlier filed Machado v. Boyd, No. 24-cv-03525-KAW (N.D. Cal. May 9, 2025), ECF No. 40 (“Machado Dismissal Order”), and the facts set forth in that order are incorporated as if fully set forth…