Michael Mente v. Traveon Rogers et al

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaNovember 24, 20252:24-cv-04470California333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL

Case No. 2:24-cv-04470-SPG-SK Date November 24, 2025 Title Michael Mente v. Traveon Rogers et al

ee Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Patricia Gomez Not Reported Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Not Present

Proceeding: (INCHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE On July 1, 2025, the Court denied Plaintiff Michael Mente’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Default Judgment under Rule 55(b)(1). (ECF No. 41 (“Order”)). The denial informed Plaintiff that it was without prejudice to Plaintiff refiling a Motion for Default Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2), that: (1) complied with all requirements of the Rule and related Local Rules; (2) addressed the factors set forth in Eite/ v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir. 1986); and (3) addressed whether the Court may exercise personal jurisdiction over Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.