Wofford

Amit Sharma v. Minga Wofford

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20251:25-cv-01793California487 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 AMIT SHARMA, No. 1:25-CV-1793-DAD-SCR Petitioner, v. ORDER MINGA WOFFORD, Respondent. 15 Petitioner, an immigration detainee who is represented by counsel, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court has conducted a preliminary review of the petition pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254. Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to show cause why the writ should not be granted by filing an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this order. See 28 U.S.C. § 2243. Petitioner may file a reply/traverse to the answer/return within 7 days after being served a copy of it. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent is directed to file an answer/return within 14 days from the date of this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.