Walker

Kennard Davis v. James Walker, et al.; Kennard Davis v. James Walker, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20252:08-cv-00593California809 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Kennard Davis, No. 2:08-cv-00593-KJM-SCR Plaintiff, v. 14 James Walker, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Kennar d Davis, No. 2:10-cv-02139-KJM-SCR Plaintiff, ORDER v. James Walker, et al., 21 Defendants. 22 23 Plaintiff Kennard Davis alleges in the two actions captioned above that prison staff denied medical care to plaintiff in retaliation for filing appeals, used excessive force, destroyed legal documents and took other similarly harmful actions. Defendants deny these claims. The court has previously found plaintiff is not competent to proceed pro se, and plaintiff is now represented by a guardian ad litem. The parties in both cases have reached settlement agreements and now move jointly for approval of the agreements in each case. See Case No. 08-593, ECF No. 528; Case No. 10-2139, ECF No. 558. The parties agree the settlement agreements in the two related cases are a full and complete compromise of all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.