H.

E. H., et al. v. META PLATFORMS, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 23, 20253:23-cv-04784California3,328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 E. H., et al., Case No. 23-cv-04784-WHO (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE DECEMBER 3, 2025

v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE

CUSTODIANS AND DOCUMENT

META PLATFORMS, INC., REQUESTS Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 149

12 The parties ask the Court to resolve two categories of disputes: (1) whether plaintiffs may obtain discovery from Meta responsive to 12 disputed document requests as part of the supplemental discovery the presiding judge has permitted; and (2) whether Meta should be required to search the records of 57 custodians (40 existing Healthcare custodians, plus 17 new custodians) as part of this supplemental discovery. Dkt. No. 149. The Court held a hearing on

19 1 Plaintiffs move to seal the discovery letter brief and exhibits, in their entirety, on the ground that Meta claims the contents are confidential. Dkt. No. 150. In response, Meta requests sealing for a 20 narrowed portion of the discovery letter (portions of page 5,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.