Matteson

Curtis Lee Morrison v. Martin Keursten, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20252:23-cv-00850California1,969 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS LEE MORRISON, Case No. 2:23-cv-0850-DAD-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MARTIN KEURSTEN, et al.,

Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brought this action under section 1983 alleging that defendants Martin Keursten, the Chief Medical Executive of California State Prison-Solano (“CSP-Solano”), and A. Muhammad, a correctional sergeant, violated his Eighth Amendment rights by causing him to contract the COVID-19 virus. ECF No. 13 at 3. Defendants have moved for summary judgment, ECF No. 35, plaintiff has filed an opposition, ECF No. 38, and defendants have filed a reply, ECF No. 39. After review of the pleadings, I find that defendants’ motion should be granted. 25 Legal Standards Summary judgment is appropriate where there is “no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.