Wellpath

Sharon N. Dailey v. Wellpath, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaDecember 19, 20252:24-cv-00669California806 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARON N. DAILEY, No. 2:24-cv-00669-DAD-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

WELLPATH, et al., PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT, AND CLOSING THIS

Defendants. ACTION (Doc. No. 16) 17 Plaintiff Sharon N. Dailey is a former county inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 9, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) (Doc. No. 16) be dismissed without leave to amend. (Doc. No. 23.) In particular, the assigned magistrate judge found that plaintiff’s first amended complaint in this case sets forth allegations which are duplicative of claims raised by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.